Week 3: Why is this book necessary?
After studying degrowth and ecological economics for nearly 10 years, I’ve found that most of the literature focuses on:
1. Explaining why capitalism is unjust, dangerous, and at the root of multiple crises.
2. Highlighting alternatives that are more democratic and just, even if they aren’t nation-wide systems.
Regarding
(1), much of the focus is on averages, often portraying a class-free
world where some places are rich, and others are poor, neglecting
distribution differences within countries, class disparities, and the
internationalization of capital. The Global North and South narrative,
while useful for discussing structural inequalities, falls short in
fostering a global working-class consciousness. We must address colonial
arrangements and engage the working class across the globe.
Regarding
(2), it’s essential to showcase "nowtopias"—places where time is
abundant, poverty is absent, and coexistence with other living beings
has thrived for millennia. However, the critical question remains: how
do we create our own utopia, and how do we navigate toward it? We need
theories of transformation and tools for transition to design, organize,
and implement democratic alternatives within planetary boundaries.
I’m building upon three key books:
- Degrowth and Strategy: How to Bring about Social-Ecological Transformation(2020)
- Deep Transformations: A Theory of Degrowth (2024)
- Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth(2019)
These books help, but we also need:
- A toolbox to understand what has worked historically to make transitions mainstream.
- A theory of change that centers on class as a key transformation element.
- Alternatives embedded in a new economic system rooted in human and nature rights.
This
book will help you design, organize, and implement the future you
envision. We all know a just, free, and beautiful world is possible; we
need to believe in it again and relearn the art and science of
transition-making. This book provides tentative answers to these
questions, which is why it’s important to bring it to light.
If
you, like the many who already support this project, believe in its
importance, please support its publication in multiple languages with
the highest sustainability standards.
Thanks to Diana Kobus, Eva, Juanjo, Stella Martinez McShera, Oscar, Ivan Golenko, Ivan Golenko, and many others for your support. Your energy keeps me going.
With love and solidarity. Please support if you care.
Framing Degrowth: Tiny house mobility (Chapter 6 Housing for Degrowth) Tiny houses can be an ally for housing for degrowth, but it should include anti capitalist and anti colonialist strategies, and go beyond miniturised middle class homes April Anson explains that her experience is that building such houses is more complex and expensive than expected The concept has been appropiate and used by so companies offering 100.000$ tiny houses There are legal challenges related to recognising such houses as a permanent dwelling It is also challenging to fully insure the house Hard to park the house close to places of social interaction, work... Tiny houses tends to support a romantic and separated relantionship with natural spaces Thoses houses are fully dependent on property laws, and do not hold their false claims of freedom Degrowth critizes more explicitely the commoditization of housing as the tiny house movement does Christiania. A poster child for degrowth? Natasha Verco ...

Comments
Post a Comment