Week 3: Why is this book necessary?
After studying degrowth and ecological economics for nearly 10 years, I’ve found that most of the literature focuses on:
1. Explaining why capitalism is unjust, dangerous, and at the root of multiple crises.
2. Highlighting alternatives that are more democratic and just, even if they aren’t nation-wide systems.
Regarding
(1), much of the focus is on averages, often portraying a class-free
world where some places are rich, and others are poor, neglecting
distribution differences within countries, class disparities, and the
internationalization of capital. The Global North and South narrative,
while useful for discussing structural inequalities, falls short in
fostering a global working-class consciousness. We must address colonial
arrangements and engage the working class across the globe.
Regarding
(2), it’s essential to showcase "nowtopias"—places where time is
abundant, poverty is absent, and coexistence with other living beings
has thrived for millennia. However, the critical question remains: how
do we create our own utopia, and how do we navigate toward it? We need
theories of transformation and tools for transition to design, organize,
and implement democratic alternatives within planetary boundaries.
I’m building upon three key books:
- Degrowth and Strategy: How to Bring about Social-Ecological Transformation(2020)
- Deep Transformations: A Theory of Degrowth (2024)
- Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth(2019)
These books help, but we also need:
- A toolbox to understand what has worked historically to make transitions mainstream.
- A theory of change that centers on class as a key transformation element.
- Alternatives embedded in a new economic system rooted in human and nature rights.
This
book will help you design, organize, and implement the future you
envision. We all know a just, free, and beautiful world is possible; we
need to believe in it again and relearn the art and science of
transition-making. This book provides tentative answers to these
questions, which is why it’s important to bring it to light.
If
you, like the many who already support this project, believe in its
importance, please support its publication in multiple languages with
the highest sustainability standards.
Thanks to Diana Kobus, Eva, Juanjo, Stella Martinez McShera, Oscar, Ivan Golenko, Ivan Golenko, and many others for your support. Your energy keeps me going.
With love and solidarity. Please support if you care.
En aquest article faig un analisi de les posicions dels diferents partits publics per afrontar un dels majors reptes de la nostra societat, com mantenir un metabolisme social necesari sense combustibles fosils, conflictes ambientals i pobresa energetica. El debat en la seva totalitat es pot trobar aqui . El rol de l'energètica pública Amb l'excepció de Junts i Ciutadans, tots els partits estan d'acord en donar més pes a l'energia pública, tot i que amb matisos en els seus objectius. La CUP, ERC i els Comuns clarament volen reduir el pes dels monopolis energètics, com és el cas flagrant de la distribució amb Endesa, que controla el 98% de la distribució, així com també de la generació, amb una dependència actual insostenible de l'energia nuclear i dels combustibles fòssils, si considerem la capacitat instal·lada renovable al territori (menys del 15%). Sorprèn especialment a la dreta i al centre la manca de comprensió que el sector energètic no pot dependre de l...

Comments
Post a Comment