Week 3: Why is this book necessary?
After studying degrowth and ecological economics for nearly 10 years, I’ve found that most of the literature focuses on:
1. Explaining why capitalism is unjust, dangerous, and at the root of multiple crises.
2. Highlighting alternatives that are more democratic and just, even if they aren’t nation-wide systems.
Regarding
(1), much of the focus is on averages, often portraying a class-free
world where some places are rich, and others are poor, neglecting
distribution differences within countries, class disparities, and the
internationalization of capital. The Global North and South narrative,
while useful for discussing structural inequalities, falls short in
fostering a global working-class consciousness. We must address colonial
arrangements and engage the working class across the globe.
Regarding
(2), it’s essential to showcase "nowtopias"—places where time is
abundant, poverty is absent, and coexistence with other living beings
has thrived for millennia. However, the critical question remains: how
do we create our own utopia, and how do we navigate toward it? We need
theories of transformation and tools for transition to design, organize,
and implement democratic alternatives within planetary boundaries.
I’m building upon three key books:
- Degrowth and Strategy: How to Bring about Social-Ecological Transformation(2020)
- Deep Transformations: A Theory of Degrowth (2024)
- Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth(2019)
These books help, but we also need:
- A toolbox to understand what has worked historically to make transitions mainstream.
- A theory of change that centers on class as a key transformation element.
- Alternatives embedded in a new economic system rooted in human and nature rights.
This
book will help you design, organize, and implement the future you
envision. We all know a just, free, and beautiful world is possible; we
need to believe in it again and relearn the art and science of
transition-making. This book provides tentative answers to these
questions, which is why it’s important to bring it to light.
If
you, like the many who already support this project, believe in its
importance, please support its publication in multiple languages with
the highest sustainability standards.
Thanks to Diana Kobus, Eva, Juanjo, Stella Martinez McShera, Oscar, Ivan Golenko, Ivan Golenko, and many others for your support. Your energy keeps me going.
With love and solidarity. Please support if you care.
Dasgupta-Heal-Solow-Stigliz Model (1974) The following model adds limited natural resources to a model similar to the one developed by Sollow. The stock of the non-renewable resource is depleted at the following rate and overall lower than the initial stock: These model assume constant susbtitution elasticities between the factors K,L, R. As Resource availability is strictly decaying, economic growth require significant amounts of factor substitution . So significant as natural resources need to become inesential in the production process. Another alternative of the model is resource augmenting technology, where that leads to an increase in effective natural resource avaialability bigger than the decline of the resource stock . The third option to explain long term economic growth is by permanently increasing the other factors, capital and labor. That would be easier the higher the productivity of those factors is. Green Solow Model with abatement The green Solow model kee...

Comments
Post a Comment